Comparison
Airdrop Finder vs ππ€ππππ§ π¬ππ©π πΌπ£π ππ©β’π₯
A side-by-side look at two public Telegram channels β audience size, reach, engagement, growth and an audience-quality estimate, all from public data.
Airdrop Finder@airdropfindteamππ€ππππ§ π¬ππ©π πΌπ£π ππ©β’π₯@rojgaarwithankit
| Metric | @airdropfindteam | @rojgaarwithankit |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 2.1M | 1.3M |
| Avg views | 171,827 | 100,039 |
| Engagement rate | 8.0% | 8.0% |
| 30-day growth | -13.0% | -0.6% |
| Language | Français | Français |
| Category | crypto | β |
| Channel age | β | β |
Audience quality
An estimate from public metrics β we have no admin access to Telegramβs native analytics, so treat this as a signal, not a verdict.
@airdropfindteam
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
@rojgaarwithankit
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
We compare only what we observe from the public surface. Engagement rate is approximate (average views per subscriber) and audience quality is an estimate, not a verdict β see the methodology.