Comparison
Bum’s Corner 📦 vs Техночат
A side-by-side look at two public Telegram channels — audience size, reach, engagement, growth and an audience-quality estimate, all from public data.
| Metric | @bums_official | @technomedia |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 4.2M | 3.2M |
| Avg views | 36,278 | 40,650 |
| Engagement rate | 0.9% | 1.3% |
| 30-day growth | -20.2% | +6.4% |
| Language | English | Русский |
| Category | trading | — |
| Channel age | — | — |
Audience quality
An estimate from public metrics — we have no admin access to Telegram’s native analytics, so treat this as a signal, not a verdict.
@bums_official
Questionable
- Views are low relative to subscribers — possibly an inactive or inflated audience
- Engagement swings sharply between snapshots — unstable reach
@technomedia
Mixed signals
- Views are low relative to subscribers — possibly an inactive or inflated audience
We compare only what we observe from the public surface. Engagement rate is approximate (average views per subscriber) and audience quality is an estimate, not a verdict — see the methodology.