Comparison
Catizen Announcement vs Maths By Aditya Ranjan - (Vidyagram) 🇮🇳
A side-by-side look at two public Telegram channels — audience size, reach, engagement, growth and an audience-quality estimate, all from public data.
Catizen Announcement@catizenannVerifiedMaths By Aditya Ranjan - (Vidyagram) 🇮🇳@mathsbyadityaranjan_vidyagram
| Metric | @catizenann | @mathsbyadityaranjan_vidyagram |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 3.3M | 2M |
| Avg views | 65,792 | 191,338 |
| Engagement rate | 2.0% | 9.4% |
| 30-day growth | -16.8% | -0.7% |
| Language | ä¸ć–‡ | हिन्दी |
| Category | gaming | retail |
| Channel age | — | — |
Audience quality
An estimate from public metrics — we have no admin access to Telegram’s native analytics, so treat this as a signal, not a verdict.
@catizenann
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
@mathsbyadityaranjan_vidyagram
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
We compare only what we observe from the public surface. Engagement rate is approximate (average views per subscriber) and audience quality is an estimate, not a verdict — see the methodology.