Comparison
🏏REDDY ANNAbtc🏏 CRYPTO vs Maths By Aditya Ranjan - (Vidyagram) 🇮🇳
A side-by-side look at two public Telegram channels — audience size, reach, engagement, growth and an audience-quality estimate, all from public data.
🏏REDDY ANNAbtc🏏 CRYPTO@crypto_ludo_group_bettinggcacMaths By Aditya Ranjan - (Vidyagram) 🇮🇳@mathsbyadityaranjan_vidyagram
| Metric | @crypto_ludo_group_bettinggcac | @mathsbyadityaranjan_vidyagram |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 1.1M | 2M |
| Avg views | 93,390 | 163,427 |
| Engagement rate | 8.4% | 8.0% |
| 30-day growth | -6.3% | +1.2% |
| Language | हिन्दी | हिन्दी |
| Category | — | — |
| Channel age | 1633 days | 2175 days |
Audience quality
An estimate from public metrics — we have no admin access to Telegram’s native analytics, so treat this as a signal, not a verdict.
@crypto_ludo_group_bettinggcac
Questionable
- Telegram flags this channel (scam, fake or restricted)
@mathsbyadityaranjan_vidyagram
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
We compare only what we observe from the public surface. Engagement rate is approximate (average views per subscriber) and audience quality is an estimate, not a verdict — see the methodology.