Comparison
مشاعر عراقيه🫂 vs Moskvada Москва работа для мигрантов
A side-by-side look at two public Telegram channels — audience size, reach, engagement, growth and an audience-quality estimate, all from public data.
| Metric | @eioez | @wildberriestov5 |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 16,260 | 19,644 |
| Avg views | 3,782 | 6,148 |
| Engagement rate | 23.3% | 31.3% |
| 30-day growth | — | — |
| Language | العربية | English |
| Category | — | — |
| Channel age | 1758 days | — |
Audience quality
An estimate from public metrics — we have no admin access to Telegram’s native analytics, so treat this as a signal, not a verdict.
@eioez
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
@wildberriestov5
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
We compare only what we observe from the public surface. Engagement rate is approximate (average views per subscriber) and audience quality is an estimate, not a verdict — see the methodology.