Comparison
HOT Updates vs Невероятно, но факт…
A side-by-side look at two public Telegram channels — audience size, reach, engagement, growth and an audience-quality estimate, all from public data.
| Metric | @hotonnear | @n_no_f |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 4.3M | 3M |
| Avg views | 343,270 | 609,000 |
| Engagement rate | 8.0% | 20.0% |
| 30-day growth | -13.2% | +36.0% |
| Language | English | Русский |
| Category | finance | news |
| Channel age | — | 603 days |
Audience quality
An estimate from public metrics — we have no admin access to Telegram’s native analytics, so treat this as a signal, not a verdict.
@hotonnear
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
@n_no_f
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
We compare only what we observe from the public surface. Engagement rate is approximate (average views per subscriber) and audience quality is an estimate, not a verdict — see the methodology.