Comparison
Леонардо Дайвинчик vs Телега
A side-by-side look at two public Telegram channels — audience size, reach, engagement, growth and an audience-quality estimate, all from public data.
| Metric | @leoday | @telegaru |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 5.5M | 6.8M |
| Avg views | 141,371 | 4.3M |
| Engagement rate | 2.6% | 63.3% |
| 30-day growth | +4.1% | -1.2% |
| Language | Русский | Русский |
| Category | — | gambling |
| Channel age | 3262 days | 477 days |
Audience quality
An estimate from public metrics — we have no admin access to Telegram’s native analytics, so treat this as a signal, not a verdict.
@leoday
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
@telegaru
Mixed signals
- Engagement swings sharply between snapshots — unstable reach
We compare only what we observe from the public surface. Engagement rate is approximate (average views per subscriber) and audience quality is an estimate, not a verdict — see the methodology.