Comparison
Невероятно, но факт… vs Николаевский Ванёк
A side-by-side look at two public Telegram channels — audience size, reach, engagement, growth and an audience-quality estimate, all from public data.
| Metric | @n_no_f | @vanek_nikolaev |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 3M | 2.6M |
| Avg views | 609,000 | 783,412 |
| Engagement rate | 20.0% | 30.4% |
| 30-day growth | +36.0% | -3.5% |
| Language | Русский | Русский |
| Category | news | — |
| Channel age | 603 days | — |
Audience quality
An estimate from public metrics — we have no admin access to Telegram’s native analytics, so treat this as a signal, not a verdict.
@n_no_f
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
@vanek_nikolaev
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
We compare only what we observe from the public surface. Engagement rate is approximate (average views per subscriber) and audience quality is an estimate, not a verdict — see the methodology.